PL25: How Sam Allardyce’s Bolton changed the face of the Premier League

When Sam Allardyce took over at Bolton Wanderers in 1999, football was a different place.

The North West club had been relegated from the Premier League in 1998, but had failed to bounce straight back, missing out in the play-offs at the end of their first season back in the Football League, then started the next season out of form, winning only three of their first 10 games.

A frustrated Colin Todd put that down to a lack of funds made available to him in his pursuit of promotion and he resigned in protest. If Bolton regretted the position their former manager had left them in, they had no need to worry: his unilateral decision paved the way for a modern golden era for the club as Allardyce was appointed in his stead.

Another play-off defeat was endured in Allardyce’s first campaign, but two remarkably promising cup runs would serve as an omen for what was to come. Despite being a second tier club, Bolton reached the semi-finals of both the League Cup – disappointingly losing to Tranmere Rovers over two legs – and the FA Cup – where they lost to Aston Villa – as well as making the top six in the First Division. The next year, Allardyce’s first full season as Bolton manager, was to see those near misses turned into a more tangible success: play-off success and promotion back to the Premier League.

Winning promotion as a manager is the kind of thing that can get you a reputation, especially if you do it more than once. Coaches can become typecast as promotion specialists, and Allardyce was to be enlisted by West Ham United later in his career when the Hammers found themselves relegated to the Championship.

But Allardyce’s reputation isn’t so much for getting teams into the Premier League but for keeping them there. The ‘Fireman Sam’ tag gained for his ability to come into a struggling team and stave off the drop is surely an unfair one for a man who has been at the forefront of the English managerial world since that promotion back in 2001, but there is a reason for it. It all started with Bolton.

In the glory years at what was, back then, the Reebok Stadium, people will remember long balls to Kevin Davies, Kevin Nolan getting stuck in, and Allardyce sitting in the stands with an earpiece. European football arrived at Bolton, and although the manager’s other reputation – for particularly unattractive football – was forged, it was actually his more cosmopolitan traits which brought Wanderers to such dizzy heights.

The first two seasons were struggles, though. Finishing just above the relegation zone twice, safety wasn’t always a given. Although the first season saw Bolton finish in 16th place, the second one saw them drop to 17th, despite winning more games and gaining four more points. Even if the position didn’t improve, there was definitely progress.

Football – FA Barclaycard Premiership 03/04 – Bolton Wanderers v Wolverhampton Wanderers – 27/9/03 Sam Allardyce – Bolton Wanderers Manager with Ivan Campo after being substituted Mandatory Credit:Action Images / Darren Walsh

In the 15 years since then, English football has changed quite a bit, and quite a lot of that has to do with Allardyce’s strategy for keeping his team in the Premier League.

The first season, Bolton’s most expensive signing was Danish forward Henrik Pedersen. Bought for £650k, the Dane went on to make 143 appearances for the club in the Premier League, and it’s a similar story with other players from around Europe. Foreign imports into the Premier League were seen as exotic signs of wealth and intent, but that’s not really what Allardyce was doing.

He wasn’t spending big money, even then, but instead bringing in players he knew would add to his squad and would cost less than British players of an equivalent standard. Bruno N’Gotty, was a player who had played for some big clubs, but cost only half a million when Bolton signed him from Paris Saint-Germain. He went on to play nearly 150 Premier League games for the club, too, and it was these sorts of bargains coupled with Allardyce’s coaching prowess that would see Bolton rise up from the reaches of the relegation zone to the European places.

For all the accusations of Allardyce being a throwback to an old style of football with his teams’ directness and physicality, it was actually his modern outlook that made his sides overperform. His espousal of stats and technologies to aid his understanding of the game, not to mention his own players’ abilities, was a key factor, as was the fact that Allardyce kept abreast of the European transfer market in order to buy the best players he could within his own budget.

That didn’t just extend to relative unknowns either. Youri Djorkaeff, a French international and World Cup winner signed on a free transfer and scored 20 goals in 75 appearances for Bolton. Jay-Jay Okocha was arguably one of Africa’s greatest footballing talents arrived on a free, too, as did Real Madrid legend Fernando Hierro.

Allardyce also worked the loan market. Former Real Madrid defender Ivan Campo joined for a season before signing permanently and was possibly one of the reasons Hierro joined Bolton at all, as did Bernard Mendy from PSG. They didn’t all work out, but it was Allardyce’s willingness to look abroad for hungry players eager to make a name for themselves in the Premier League, and who didn’t cost huge fees, that helped Bolton climb into a team capable of competing in European competition.

That’s not a trait which left Allardyce when he left Bolton. His spells at Blackburn Rovers, West Ham United, Sunderland and Crystal Palace were all characterised by astute signings geared towards solving key weaknesses in his squad. And the proof was in the pudding: when Big Sam left Bolton, they pottered around midtable before finally plummeting as far as League One.

The idea isn’t that Allardyce brought top quality players to the Reebok Stadium to bring Bolton from obscurity to Europe, it’s that he bought players to plug the right of gaps in his squad. The result of that was a rise in prestige.

If football in England has changed since Sam Allardyce took over at Bolton in 1998, it’s in no small part down to the man himself.

Odds shorten on Newcastle United nabbing Wilshere from Arsenal

Arsenal midfielder Jack Wilshere looked to have revived his career during a loan spell at Bournemouth last season.

After lengthy spells on the sidelines with injury, the England international made 27 Premier League appearances, 22 of which were starts.

However, injury struck once again during the closing stages of the campaign, and Wilshere ended his spell at Bournemouth suffering a broken leg.

The 25-year-old has since recovered and is working his way back to first-team fitness by playing for Arsenal’s Under-23s, but with two weeks of the transfer window remaining, the midfielder’s future remains uncertain.

Earlier this week, manager Arsene Wenger told reporters that Wilshere is part of his plans, but it is difficult to envisage the England star playing every week.

Numerous clubs have been linked to the player’s signature, including Italian outfits Sampdoria and Juventus.

According to the bookmakers, though, Newcastle United have a good chance of sealing his signature, with Sky Bet slashing its odds to 5/2.

Arsenal are evens to retain Wilshere’s signature, but it is worth noting that the midfielder has just one year left on his current deal.

If the Gunners opt against selling him in this window, then they risk losing him for free at the end of the 2017-18 campaign.

Newcastle manager Rafael Benitez has recruited six players so far in this window following the club’s return to the top flight.

If Wilshere can stay fit, then having a player of his calibre in the side would only boost the Magpies’ chances of survival.

In Focus: Wilshere’s Arsenal future looks bleak; he should move on

Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger has admitted that he is open to listening to offers for Jack Wilshere, reports The Guardian.

What’s the word?

Doubts have been shrouded over the midfielder’s future at the Emirates ever since he was allowed to leave to join Bournemouth on loan last summer.

Injuries have hampered the England international’s career for the last few years, which has resulted in a fall down the pecking order at Arsenal.

Wilshere is currently working his way back to fitness after recovering from a fractured leg, which he suffered at Bournemouth during the closing stages of last season.

However, judging from Wenger’s comments, he may not be working towards a return to the Arsenal team.

According to The Guardian, when asked about Wilshere’s future, the manager said:

“I’m open with Jack. We have honest conversations. I’m open to what is the best for him. He is at the stage of his career where he needs to play and I can’t guarantee him that today. I think I’m quite open on that.”

Wenger added that it is up to the 25-year-old to prove that he deserves another contract, as his current one has just 12 months left to run.

Who wants to sign him?

There has not been a flurry of interest in the injury-plagued star, but Aston Villa manager Steve Bruce told talkSPORT on Thursday that he would like Wilshere in his squad.

The coach did add, though, that he was unsure how likely it would be to get a deal over the line.

Aside from Bruce’s admission, Italian club Sampdoria made an initial £6m bid plus £1.5m in add-ons last month, according to Sky Sports.

Despite that, there has been no movement and it is still uncertain what Wilshere wants to do, as he has remained relatively quiet on the situation.

The midfielder will surely want to attract Gareth Southgate’s attention ahead of England selection for the 2018 World Cup, but that will only happen if he is playing regularly.

Although, even if he is getting minutes under his belt at a lower league team, if a rival is performing in the Premier League, then Wilshere is likely to miss out.

The biggest problem for the midfielder is his injury record, and that understandably would make a club hesitant to sign him.

Perhaps the best thing for Wilshere is to get his head down and work on his fitness, but not at Arsenal.

Tottenham Hotspur fans fear the worst after being handed horror Champions League group

Fans of the Premier League’s elite were all looking forward to Thursday’s Champions League draw, but some were left feeling deflated after the groups were decided.

Tottenham Hotspur have arguably been handed the toughest draw out of their fellow English clubs.

Mauricio Pochettino’s side will face Borussia Dortmund, Apoel and reigning champions Real Madrid.

It is important for the North London club to have a positive run in the tournament having failed to progress past the group phase last season.

However, the task has been made even tougher now that they have to take on one of the Spanish greats and 2012-13 runners-up Dortmund.

Another potential problem for Spurs is their record at Wembley, where they will be playing all of their home games in domestic and European competitions this season.

In four matches at the stadium in the 2016-17 campaign, Pochettino’s men managed to win just once, so they will need to break the Wembley hoodoo in order to progress in Europe.

As expected, Tottenham fans were glued to the draw as it was taking place, and many would have had their head in their hands once the group was finalised.

Some chose to express their disappointment in gifs after Tottenham confirmed their opponents on Twitter.

Liverpool fans want Klopp to play Firmino in his best position

Liverpool are already in danger of being cut adrift from the likes of Manchester City and Manchester United at the top of the English Premier League after they failed to win again on Saturday.

Having previously drawn with Watford and losing to City themselves, Liverpool haven’t been at peak form at the start of this season and that continued at Anfield against Burnley.

Labouring to a 1-1 draw with Sean Dyche’s men, the Reds couldn’t find that cutting edge in the final third to pick up the win. Mohamed Salah did quickly equalise after Scott Arfield’s opener, but their visitors held on for a big point.

One of the Liverpool supporters’ big problems on the day was Jurgen Klopp’s insistence of playing Roberto Firmino out wide on the left hand side instead of playing him through the middle as a central striker, or even behind Daniel Sturridge.

They took to Twitter to share their thoughts about the issue…

Cesar Azpilicueta the real hero of Chelsea’s 4-0 win over Stoke City

The Bet365 Stadium has proved a difficult environment for the Premier League’s top clubs this season, Stoke already earning a home win over Arsenal and a bitter-fought point against Manchester United, but it wasn’t a hurdle in Chelsea’s title defence on Saturday as the Blues bagged an incredibly convincing 4-0 victory.

Summer signing Alvaro Morata inevitably stole the headlines, producing a hat-trick the game after Chelsea confirmed the departure of his centre-forward predecessor, Diego Costa, to former club Atletico Madrid.

But scratch a little deeper and the Spain international’s compatriot Cesar Azpilicueta was the real star of the show, not only playing a pivotal role in a clean sheet away from home as the most experienced member of a relatively unfamiliar Chelsea back three, but also making huge contributions at the other end with four chances created – two of which Morata converted.

Also weighing in with the third-most touches of the ball of any Chelsea player, it was a performance that highlighted how underrated the 28-year-old, who wore the captain’s armband on Saturday, is in the grand scheme of European football.

Capable of playing any role in a back three (including the wing-back slots) and a back four, impeccable defensively yet also comfortable and sometimes even creative on the ball, is there a team in the world that couldn’t find room for Azpilicueta in their defence?

Everton legend Peter Reid says club should have signed Fernando Llorente

Everton legend Peter Reid has told the Liverpool Echo that the club should have signed Fernando Llorente during the summer transfer window when they discovered that a deal for Arsenal’s Olivier Giroud wasn’t going to be possible.

Toffees boss Ronald Koeman was desperate to bring in a direct replacement for Romelu Lukaku before the end of August with Sandro Ramirez taking time adapt to the Premier League and the side struggling for goals in the early stages of the campaign, but they failed to sign anyone.

Koeman is under pressure with the club currently lying 16th in the top flight standings and having taken just one point from a possible six in their Europa League group despite a big summer of spending, and Reid believes they missed out by not snapping up Llorente.

The tall centre-forward scored 15 goals in 33 Premier League appearances for a struggling Swansea City in his first season in England, and the 32-year-old completed a move to Tottenham Hotspur on deadline day.

Soccer Football – Carabao Cup Third Round – Tottenham Hotspur vs Barnsley – Wembley Stadium, London, Britain – September 19, 2017 Tottenham’s Fernando Llorente in action Action Images via Reuters/Matthew Childs EDITORIAL USE ONLY. No use with unauthorized audio, video, data, fixture lists, club/league logos or “live” services. Online in-match use limited to 75 images, no video emulation. No use in betting, games or single club/league/player publications. Please contact your account represe

However, the Spaniard has been playing back-up to Harry Kane under Mauricio Pochettino and has played just 17 minutes of Premier League football so far, while Everton are now relying on the previously frozen out Oumar Niasse to find the net.

Reid told the Liverpool Echo: “I think last January, it was common knowledge that Lukaku was going, so I found it strange that they didn’t get a recognised striker in, as hard as it might have been.

“They should have gone and got one in.

“If Giroud wouldn’t come, Fernando Llorente was available and he’d have done for me. Llorente was gettable, so they are out there.”

Everton will look to bounce back from their 1-0 defeat at home to Burnley last time out when they face newly-promoted Brighton and Hove Albion at the Amex Stadium on Sunday.

Merson sets out prediction for Liverpool, United at Anfield

Former Arsenal forward Paul Merson has said that the loss of Sadio Mane will harm Liverpool’s chances of beating Manchester United at Anfield this weekend.

Mane is facing six weeks on the sidelines after picking up a hamstring injury while representing Senegal during the recent international break.

Merson has claimed that Liverpool would have had a chance of overcoming United with the presence of their leading scorer, but the 49-year-old does not believe that the Reds have enough as it stands.

United will travel to Merseyside having won six of their seven Premier League matches at the start of the 2017-18 campaign, which has left them in second position in the table. Liverpool, meanwhile, are five places and seven points behind Jose Mourinho’s side.

Merson told Sky Sports:

“This is a massive game, but I just don’t see how Liverpool win without Sadio Mane. I half-fancied them with Mane, but I can’t see it now.

“It will be interesting to see how United approach it. You would like to think, with the squad and firepower they have got, that they will have a go. But we have said that before and they have parked the bus, so we will have to see what happens.

“It’s a big game for Romelu Lukaku. Now he is with one of the big boys he has to perform against the big boys. Manchester United are a better team but Liverpool’s home advantage should help them get a draw.”

Liverpool could also be without the services of Dejan Lovren for the clash at Anfield, but Mourinho has a problem in central midfield.

Indeed, Marouane Fellaini has joined Paul Pogba and Michael Carrick on the sidelines, leaving Nemanja Matic and Ander Herrera as United’s only fit senior central midfielders.

Three reasons Slaven Bilic is getting it so wrong by ignoring Toni Martinez

According to the reliable @ExWHUemployee on Episode 61 of the West Ham Way radio show, West Ham United manager Slaven Bilic isn’t picking in-form starlet Toni Martinez for the first team as he doesn’t believe he is good enough yet.

The Irons’ 2-2 draw against bottom-of-the-table Crystal Palace at Selhurst Park on Saturday increased the pressure once again on Bilic after a brilliant Carabao Cup win against Tottenham Hotspur at Wembley days earlier, with his team surrendering a two-goal lead and giving away a 96th minute equaliser against the Eagles.

Despite his fine form for the U21 and U23 sides this term Martinez hasn’t been involved with the first team at all, even when both Diafra Sakho and Andy Carroll were absent for the 3-0 home defeat by Brighton and Hove Albion.

His exclusion has been particularly confusing and frustrating for the London Stadium faithful, and Bilic is missing a trick by not letting him feature in his match day squads.

Here are three reasons Bilic is getting it so wrong by ignoring Martinez…

Goals

With 10 goals in their opening 10 Premier League matches this season and with Javier Hernandez, Carroll and Sakho scoring just four of those, it is clear to see that Bilic would probably benefit by having more firepower in the squad.

The brace that Martinez netted in the 3-1 Checkatrade Trophy win against Bristol Rovers in the Memorial Stadium on Tuesday took his tally for the campaign to 11, and continued his prolific form in front of goal for the U23 side.

He certainly has that goalscoring touch and he could offer a different option from the substitutes’ bench when the Irons need to find the net.

The fans love an academy player

Bilic certainly isn’t popular among the majority of the West Ham fan base right now considering some of the poor performances and results they have witnessed since the start of last season, and the Croatian boss is certainly missing a trick by not giving Martinez an opportunity.

All football fans love it when a youngster from the academy gets a chance in the first team – especially one that has been so prolific – and while Bilic may see it as a risk that he can’t afford to take right now, it wouldn’t even be much of one considering he is 20 years of age and could be partnered with an experienced player like Carroll or Hernandez if needs be.

Confidence

While a number of West Ham senior players seem to be suffering from a distinct lack of confidence right now – especially after the demoralising collapse against Crystal Palace – Martinez could prove to be a breath of fresh air if he was brought into the first-team squad.

The 20-year-old seemingly can’t stop scoring right now and his positive mentality and self-belief could provide a boost to a manager and players that have appeared to be quite forlorn in recent Premier League matches.

Do you agree, Irons fans? Let us know below.

HYS: Should Joe Hart be England’s World Cup captain?

Since Wayne Rooney was dropped from the England squad in March this year, Gareth Southgate has issued the Three Lions armband to five different players already, seemingly undecided on who should be  skipper at the World Cup in Russia next summer.

Eric Dier was issued the most recent audition against Germany and Brazil and certainly didn’t let himself down. But Football FanCast are taking a look at the arguments for and against giving the captaincy to a considerably more seasoned England man – West Ham loanee Joe Hart.

Pros – Vast experience, vocal character and will be a constant if picked

With 75 caps to his name, Hart is the most experienced member of Southgate’s latest squad by quite some distance. In fact, the only more-capped player to be called up since Southgate took charge from Sam Allardyce is indeed Rooney.

Domestically and in terms of age too, the 30-year-old offers far more experience than most; he’s won two Premier League titles, reached the latter stages of the Champions League and even spent a year of his career in a foreign top flight with Torino – how many England players can say that?

He’s also a very confident character who won’t be afraid to make his voice heard if others aren’t pulling their weight, and should Hart retain the No.1 jersey for the World Cup, he’ll be one of the few constants in Southgate’s starting XI. That’s still a big if though, which brings us onto…

Cons – Uncertain role and questionable composure

With Jordan Pickford and Jack Butland seemingly gaining ground with every appearance they make, be that at club or international level, there’s no guarantee Hart will still be Southgate’s first-choice by the time the World Cup comes around. We already know Butland was pencilled in to start against Germany but suffered a broken finger – Hart taking his starting berth instead.

David Moyes instilling more defensive discipline and organisation at West Ham should help Hart’s Premier League form but with a big emphasis on building for the future, Southgate may opt for younger alternatives next summer.

Furthermore, even if Hart does start in Russia, there’s still question marks over his temperament and composure. All goalkeepers are guilty of errors but Hart’s always appear to be sourced from a rush of blood to the head, and the energetic cockiness he showed in the tunnel before that monumental error against Iceland at Euro 2016 still lives long in the memory.

Hart may be a very loud voice, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he says the right things and after that horrific exit in summer 2016, focus will be a key word for Southgate at the World Cup.

So, should Hart be England’s World Cup captain? Let us know by voting below…

Game
Register
Service
Bonus